robertogreco {tumblr}


grecolaborativo

writing

twitter/rogre pinboard/robertogreco

lizettegreco.com flickr/lizettegreco flickr/robertogreco vimeo/robertogreco stellar/robertogreco reading/rogre

tcsnmy8.tumblr.com tcsnmy7.tumblr.com tcsnmy6.tumblr.com

Being a good mom, being a good dad, being a good neighbor – these things are every bit as urgent and political as self-consciously being “radical” no? Randall Szott (goes well with Charlie Loyd)
The best way to resist a monolithic institution or corporation is not with a monolithic movement but with multiplicity itself. Rebecca Solnit (via Selin Jessa)

The great opportunity is where you are.

I just happened to read this yesterday, which was apparently a day about places.

The lesson which life repeats and constantly enforces is, “Look under foot.” You are always nearer the divine and the true sources of your power than you think. The lure of the distant and the difficult is deceptive. The great opportunity is where you are. Do not despise your own place and hour. Every place is under the stars, every place is the centre of the world. Stand in your own dooryard and you have eight thousand miles of solid ground beneath you, and all the sidereal splendors overhead.

John Burroughs, 1908 (via Caterina)

The World State

by G.K. Chesterton (via a chat with Randall Szott)

Oh, how I love Humanity,
With love so pure and pringlish,
And how I hate the horrid French,
Who never will be English!

The International Idea,
The largest and the clearest,
Is welding all the nations now,
Except the one that’s nearest.

This compromise has long been known,
This scheme of partial pardons,
In ethical societies
And small suburban gardens—

The villas and the chapels
where I learned with little labour
The way to love my fellow-man
And hate my next-door neighbour.

Little Nap Coffee Stand
5丁目-65-4 Yoyogi Shibuya
Tokyo 151-0053, Japan

(via World’s Most Seductive Shrines to Coffee)

Little Nap Coffee Stand
5丁目-65-4 Yoyogi Shibuya
Tokyo 151-0053, Japan

(via World’s Most Seductive Shrines to Coffee)

The Watershed Cabin (four-image slideshow) in Wren, Oregon belongs to Kathleen Dean Moore and her husband. It’s not far from one of my other favorite cabins. Don’t know why Moore is worth mentioning? Read this interview with her from 2001.

The Watershed Cabin (four-image slideshow) in Wren, Oregon belongs to Kathleen Dean Moore and her husband. It’s not far from one of my other favorite cabins. Don’t know why Moore is worth mentioning? Read this interview with her from 2001.

We should make as big a fuss tending the culture right in front of us – raising children, jury duty, block parties. Charlie Loyd
By embiggening the import of national abstractions, it pulls us away from good opportunities to work on simple, tangible, everyday things. Charlie Loyd
I am done with great things and big things, great institutions and big success, and I am for those tiny, invisible molecular moral forces that work from individual to individual, creeping through the crannies of the world like so many rootlets, or like the capillary oozing of water, yet which if you give them time, will rend the hardest monuments of man’s pride. William James
Most of our lives aren’t spent experiencing big, earth-shattering events. Our lives are mostly composed of tiny, seemingly insignificant moments that we don’t always take the time to appreciate. Jeffrey Brown

Slow and Small

This post was accidentally stuck in my drafts folder and forgotten until posting “Small and Slow” and “Semicolon” reminded me. The text is a series of messages (some slightly expanded) that I posted to Twitter on June 9, 2012.

The following thoughts came after graduation at The Children’s School on Thursday, June 7, a beautiful, joyful, human event, enhanced by its imperfections.

That joy is coupled with a sadness as they and I move on.

For me, the Class of 2012 consists not only of the seven young people that graduated, but also the two middle-aged people (@carwaiseto and me) who have spent the last three years with them.

The advantages of such a small group far outweigh the disadvantages.

(Edward T. Hall’s Beyond Culture makes a strong case for groups of eight to twelve and the compromises made by scaling beyond that.)

They [the members of the Class of 2012] understand their intellectual prowess should be secondary to their character.

They are friendly considerate, empathetic, and supportive, in part the product of the small class size. (Cf. “Empathy”)

While they have their place, as a culture we overvalue independence and largeness. Interdependence and intimacy are underappreciated.

I tend to like places and programs that are working “under capacity.” The quiet and lack of crowds are a large part of that attraction.

I like the stilliness and intimacy that result from the small crowds.

I will forever prefer a small group to have a conversation with over a large audience to address.

Yet our culture and economy reward scale. Subsequently the experiences and products that we create become dehumanized.

Short story: Please advocate for slow and small options.

Small and Slow

My previous post has me thinking about something that Caterina Fake posted recently, something that I first saw in John Taylor Gatto’s Dumbing Us Down. It’s a letter that Wendell Berry once wrote to the editor of a magazine:

I don’t think “global thinking” is futile, I think it is impossible. You can’t think about what you don’t know and nobody knows this planet. Some people know a little about a few small parts of it … The people who think globally do so by abstractly and statistically reducing the globe to quantities. Political tyrants and industrial exploiters have done this most successfully. Their concepts and their greed are abstract and their abstractions lead with terrifying directness and simplicity to acts that are invariably destructive. If you want to do good and preserving acts you must think and act locally. The effort to do good acts gives the global game away. You can’t do a good act that is global … a good act, to be good must be acceptable to what Alexander Pope called “the genius of the place”. This calls for local knowledge, local skills, and local love that virtually none of us has, and that none of us can get by thinking globally. We can get it only by a local fidelity that we would have to maintain through several lifetimes … I don’t wish to be loved by people who don’t know me; if I were a planet I would feel exactly the same way.

I have a collection of posts tagged ‘small’ (bookmarks tagged ‘small’ too) that overlaps with my posts tagged ‘slow’ (and ‘slow’ bookmarks), this post and Starck’s Teddy Bear Band included. These concepts are important to me.

Megan posted a quote from The Happiness Project, by Gretchen Rubin.


  The head of Eliza’s school told a story about a four-year-old who had a blue toy car he loved. He took it everywhere, played with it constantly. Then when his grandmother came to visit, she bought him ten toy cars, and he stopped playing with the cars altogether. ‘Why don’t you play with your cars?’ she asked. ‘You loved your blue car so much.’ ‘I can’t love lots of cars,’ he answered.


That made me think about one of my favorite Phillipe Starck designs, TeddyBearBand (1998). The bear itself is interesting, but it’s Starck’s explanation that brings the beauty.


  In my opinion, an overabundance of toys fosters infidelity. Instead of forming a lasting attachment to one toy, the child flits ever faster from one to another, the greater the number of toys, the more frantic the pace. There is no reason that, later on, he or she should treat people, a friend or a lover any differently. As an advocate of the one-true-love approach, I dreamt of a single toy that would serve as an apprenticeship for the lasting human relationships that await our children.
  
  A surreal toy, TeddyBearBand stimulates the imagination, considerabily more than any mere plush bear. It removes love and friendship from the realm of disposable emotions.”

Megan posted a quote from The Happiness Project, by Gretchen Rubin.

The head of Eliza’s school told a story about a four-year-old who had a blue toy car he loved. He took it everywhere, played with it constantly. Then when his grandmother came to visit, she bought him ten toy cars, and he stopped playing with the cars altogether. ‘Why don’t you play with your cars?’ she asked. ‘You loved your blue car so much.’ ‘I can’t love lots of cars,’ he answered.

That made me think about one of my favorite Phillipe Starck designs, TeddyBearBand (1998). The bear itself is interesting, but it’s Starck’s explanation that brings the beauty.

In my opinion, an overabundance of toys fosters infidelity. Instead of forming a lasting attachment to one toy, the child flits ever faster from one to another, the greater the number of toys, the more frantic the pace. There is no reason that, later on, he or she should treat people, a friend or a lover any differently. As an advocate of the one-true-love approach, I dreamt of a single toy that would serve as an apprenticeship for the lasting human relationships that await our children.

A surreal toy, TeddyBearBand stimulates the imagination, considerabily more than any mere plush bear. It removes love and friendship from the realm of disposable emotions.”